{"id":"https://openalex.org/W2802016687","doi":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1289080","title":"\"Let Congress Do It\": The Case for an Absolute Rule of Statutory Stare Decisis","display_name":"\"Let Congress Do It\": The Case for an Absolute Rule of Statutory Stare Decisis","publication_year":1989,"publication_date":"1989-11-01","ids":{"openalex":"https://openalex.org/W2802016687","doi":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1289080","mag":"2802016687"},"language":"en","primary_location":{"id":"doi:10.2307/1289080","doi":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1289080","is_oa":false,"landing_page_url":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1289080","pdf_url":null,"source":{"id":"https://openalex.org/S69429964","display_name":"Michigan Law Review","issn_l":"0026-2234","issn":["0026-2234","1939-8557"],"is_oa":false,"is_in_doaj":false,"is_core":false,"listed_in":["anvur-class-a","anvur-scientific","jufo-2","norway-1","poland-200","russia-white-list-1"],"host_organization":"https://openalex.org/P4310315934","host_organization_name":"University of Michigan Law School","host_organization_lineage":["https://openalex.org/P4310315934","https://openalex.org/P4310316579"],"host_organization_lineage_names":["University of Michigan Law School","University of Michigan"],"type":"journal"},"license":null,"license_id":null,"version":"publishedVersion","is_accepted":true,"is_published":true,"raw_source_name":"Michigan Law Review","raw_type":"journal-article"},"volume":null,"type":"article","is_traditional":true,"indexed_in":["crossref"],"open_access":{"is_oa":false,"oa_status":"closed","oa_url":null,"any_repository_has_fulltext":false},"authorships":[{"author_position":"first","author":{"id":"https://openalex.org/A5028711925","display_name":"Lawrence C. Marshall","orcid":null,"observed_orcids":[]},"institutions":[],"countries":[],"is_corresponding":true,"raw_author_name":"Lawrence C. Marshall","raw_affiliation_strings":[],"raw_orcid":null,"affiliations":[]}],"institutions":[],"countries_distinct_count":0,"institutions_distinct_count":0,"corresponding_author_ids":["https://openalex.org/A5028711925"],"corresponding_institution_ids":[],"apc_list":null,"apc_paid":null,"fwci":13.4418,"has_fulltext":false,"cited_by_count":17,"citation_normalized_percentile":{"value":0.982407,"is_in_top_1_percent":false,"is_in_top_10_percent":true},"cited_by_percentile_year":{"min":87,"max":97},"biblio":{"volume":"88","issue":"2","first_page":"177","last_page":"177"},"is_retracted":false,"is_paratext":false,"is_xpac":false,"primary_topic":{"id":"https://openalex.org/T14013","display_name":"Legal Language and Interpretation","score":0.4580000042915344,"subfield":{"id":"https://openalex.org/subfields/3308","display_name":"Law"},"field":{"id":"https://openalex.org/fields/33","display_name":"Social Sciences"},"domain":{"id":"https://openalex.org/domains/2","display_name":"Social Sciences"}},"topics":[{"id":"https://openalex.org/T14013","display_name":"Legal Language and Interpretation","score":0.4580000042915344,"subfield":{"id":"https://openalex.org/subfields/3308","display_name":"Law"},"field":{"id":"https://openalex.org/fields/33","display_name":"Social Sciences"},"domain":{"id":"https://openalex.org/domains/2","display_name":"Social Sciences"}},{"id":"https://openalex.org/T10802","display_name":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","score":0.38600000739097595,"subfield":{"id":"https://openalex.org/subfields/3308","display_name":"Law"},"field":{"id":"https://openalex.org/fields/33","display_name":"Social Sciences"},"domain":{"id":"https://openalex.org/domains/2","display_name":"Social Sciences"}},{"id":"https://openalex.org/T13138","display_name":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","score":0.05790000036358833,"subfield":{"id":"https://openalex.org/subfields/2002","display_name":"Economics and Econometrics"},"field":{"id":"https://openalex.org/fields/20","display_name":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance"},"domain":{"id":"https://openalex.org/domains/2","display_name":"Social Sciences"}}],"keywords":[{"id":"https://openalex.org/keywords/separation-of-powers","display_name":"separation of powers","score":0.6510000228881836},{"id":"https://openalex.org/keywords/countermajoritarian-difficulty","display_name":"countermajoritarian difficulty","score":0.8080000281333923},{"id":"https://openalex.org/keywords/constitutional-review","display_name":"constitutional review","score":0.5830000042915344},{"id":"https://openalex.org/keywords/statutory-interpretation","display_name":"statutory interpretation","score":0.628000020980835},{"id":"https://openalex.org/keywords/legislative-oversight-of-courts","display_name":"legislative oversight of courts","score":0.4309999942779541},{"id":"https://openalex.org/keywords/legislative-process","display_name":"legislative process","score":0.36899998784065247}],"concepts":[{"id":"https://openalex.org/C2779204856","wikidata":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q779439","display_name":"Statutory interpretation","level":3,"score":0.7309269309043884},{"id":"https://openalex.org/C158129432","wikidata":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7766927","display_name":"Statutory law","level":2,"score":0.6733452081680298},{"id":"https://openalex.org/C2777487392","wikidata":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q481201","display_name":"Absolute (philosophy)","level":2,"score":0.6536325216293335},{"id":"https://openalex.org/C17744445","wikidata":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q36442","display_name":"Political science","level":0,"score":0.584239661693573},{"id":"https://openalex.org/C199539241","wikidata":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7748","display_name":"Law","level":1,"score":0.54916912317276},{"id":"https://openalex.org/C190253527","wikidata":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q295354","display_name":"Law and economics","level":1,"score":0.41598063707351685},{"id":"https://openalex.org/C162324750","wikidata":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q8134","display_name":"Economics","level":0,"score":0.2545715868473053},{"id":"https://openalex.org/C138885662","wikidata":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q5891","display_name":"Philosophy","level":0,"score":0.12117800116539001},{"id":"https://openalex.org/C111472728","wikidata":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q9471","display_name":"Epistemology","level":1,"score":0.06240132451057434}],"mesh":[],"locations_count":2,"locations":[{"id":"doi:10.2307/1289080","doi":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1289080","is_oa":false,"landing_page_url":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1289080","pdf_url":null,"source":{"id":"https://openalex.org/S69429964","display_name":"Michigan Law Review","issn_l":"0026-2234","issn":["0026-2234","1939-8557"],"is_oa":false,"is_in_doaj":false,"is_core":false,"listed_in":["anvur-class-a","anvur-scientific","jufo-2","norway-1","poland-200","russia-white-list-1"],"host_organization":"https://openalex.org/P4310315934","host_organization_name":"University of Michigan Law School","host_organization_lineage":["https://openalex.org/P4310315934","https://openalex.org/P4310316579"],"host_organization_lineage_names":["University of Michigan Law School","University of Michigan"],"type":"journal"},"license":null,"license_id":null,"version":"publishedVersion","is_accepted":true,"is_published":true,"raw_source_name":"Michigan Law Review","raw_type":"journal-article"},{"id":"pmh:oai:repository.law.umich.edu:mlr-5341","doi":null,"is_oa":false,"landing_page_url":"https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol88/iss2/2","pdf_url":null,"source":{"id":"https://openalex.org/S4306401049","display_name":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","issn_l":null,"issn":null,"is_oa":false,"is_in_doaj":false,"is_core":false,"listed_in":[],"host_organization":"https://openalex.org/I32971472","host_organization_name":"Yale University","host_organization_lineage":["https://openalex.org/I32971472"],"host_organization_lineage_names":[],"type":"repository"},"license":null,"license_id":null,"version":"submittedVersion","is_accepted":false,"is_published":false,"raw_source_name":"Michigan Law Review","raw_type":"text"}],"best_oa_location":null,"sustainable_development_goals":[{"display_name":"Peace, justice, and strong institutions","score":0.7297000288963318,"id":"https://metadata.un.org/sdg/16"}],"study_designs":[],"awards":[],"funders":[],"has_content":{"grobid_xml":false,"pdf":false},"content_urls":null,"referenced_works_count":0,"referenced_works":[],"related_works":["https://openalex.org/W140000193","https://openalex.org/W7119494849","https://openalex.org/W2796843066","https://openalex.org/W201987634","https://openalex.org/W2263345023","https://openalex.org/W4244919795","https://openalex.org/W3019825049","https://openalex.org/W1577295069","https://openalex.org/W3125472721","https://openalex.org/W1535680278"],"abstract_inverted_index":{"The":[0,128],"sporadic":[1],"way":[2,401],"that":[3,39,138,156,174,180,222,239,258,290,296,314,345,358,382,410,424,453],"various":[4],"members":[5],"of":[6,17,27,37,52,67,78,90,102,118,134,151,167,173,190,201,212,228,232,269,272,302,318,322,337,340,367,376,397,437,446,462,467,485],"the":[7,11,15,25,50,53,65,76,88,108,135,143,148,164,199,202,209,240,267,285,316,343,346,359,365,419,430,434,442,454,489],"Supreme":[8,93,455],"Court":[9,94,109,241,456],"and":[10,205,284,295,412,423,426,470,478,481,492],"legal":[12],"community":[13],"treat":[14],"principle":[16],"stare":[18,28,79,119,192,234,304,448,463],"decisis":[19,29,80,120,193,305,464],"is":[20,71,98,110,183,206,254,264,384,405,415],"increasingly":[21],"striking.":[22],"At":[23,47],"times,":[24,49],"rule":[26,54,77,117,189,231,301,445,461],"appears":[30],"to":[31,56,74,162,185,197,256,266,278,386,402,406,432,488],"be":[32,57,307],"trotted":[33],"out":[34],"in":[35,112,121,125,226,352,364,393],"defense":[36,227],"decisions":[38],"were":[40],"actually":[41],"reached":[42],"on":[43,247,324,334],"quite":[44],"independent":[45],"grounds.":[46],"other":[48,61,126],"dictates":[51],"appear":[55],"casually":[58],"ignored":[59],"when":[60],"factors":[62],"call":[63],"for":[64,142,350,417,465],"overruling":[66],"a":[68,82,92,114,168,187,229,297,330,335,483],"precedent.":[69,176],"It":[70],"tempting,":[72],"therefore,":[73],"dismiss":[75],"as":[81,389],"mere":[83],"rhetorical":[84],"device,":[85],"much":[86],"like":[87],"question":[89],"whether":[91,107],"nominee's":[95],"judicial":[96,270,320],"philosophy":[97],"an":[99,390,459],"appropriate":[100],"subject":[101],"senatorial":[103],"inquiry.\\nThis":[104],"article":[105,129,356,380,451,495],"analyzes":[106],"justified":[111],"invoking":[113],"more":[115],"forceful":[116],"statutory":[122,191,213,233,249,303,353,368,398,421,447,469],"cases":[123],"than":[124],"instances.":[127],"begins":[130],"by":[131,158,310],"analyzing":[132],"some":[133,311],"conventional":[136],"justifications":[137],"have":[139,223,348],"been":[140,224],"offered":[141],"rule.":[144],"Part":[145,177,215,288],"I":[146,178],"evaluates":[147],"retrospective":[149],"theory":[150,313,332],"congressional":[152],"acquiescence,":[153],"which":[154],"posits":[155],"Congress,":[157],"not":[159,243,293],"enacting":[160],"legislation":[161],"reverse":[163],"Court's":[165,420,435],"construction":[166,321],"statute,":[169],"demonstrates":[170],"its":[171,245,468],"approval":[172],"earlier":[175],"argues":[179,289],"this":[181,287,355,379,394,404,450,494],"rationale":[182],"unable":[184],"support":[186],"heightened":[188,230,298,444],"because":[194,252,262],"it":[195,383],"fails":[196],"reflect":[198],"realities":[200],"legislative":[203],"process":[204,396],"inconsistent":[207],"with":[208],"established":[210],"goals":[211],"interpretation.":[214],"II":[216],"considers":[217],"two":[218],"resource":[219],"allocation":[220],"principles":[221,237],"advanced":[225],"decisis.":[235],"These":[236],"posit":[238],"need":[242],"expend":[244],"resources":[246,280],"revisiting":[248,319],"precedents":[250],"either":[251],"Congress":[253,263,283,388,408],"available":[255],"serve":[257],"role,":[259],"or,":[260],"alternatively,":[261],"indifferent":[265],"accuracy":[268],"interpretations":[271,436],"statutes.":[273,439],"Although":[274],"these":[275,377],"theories":[276],"attempt":[277],"allocate":[279],"efficiently":[281],"between":[282],"Court,":[286],"they":[291],"do":[292,403],"succeed,":[294],"or":[299],"absolute":[300,460],"can":[306],"supported":[308],"only":[309,413,427],"normative":[312,331],"puts":[315],"job":[317],"statutes":[323],"Congress'":[325],"shoulders.\\nPart":[326],"III":[327],"develops":[328],"such":[329],"based":[333],"vision":[336],"constitutional":[338],"separation":[339],"powers.":[341],"Examining":[342],"role":[344,361],"courts":[347,362],"fashioned":[349],"themselves":[351],"interpretation,":[354],"suggests":[357],"dominant":[360],"play":[363],"development":[366],"law":[369,473],"poses":[370],"significant":[371],"countermajoritarian":[372],"difficulties.":[373],"In":[374],"light":[375],"difficulties,":[378],"asserts":[381],"critical":[385],"reinvolve":[387],"active":[391],"participant":[392],"ongoing":[395],"lawmaking.":[399],"One":[400],"let":[407],"know":[409],"it,":[411,414,425,428],"responsible":[416],"reviewing":[418],"decisions,":[422],"has":[429],"power":[431],"overrule":[433],"federal":[438,471],"Beyond":[440],"defending":[441],"traditional":[443],"decisis,":[449],"concludes":[452],"should":[457],"adopt":[458],"all":[466],"common":[472],"decisions.":[474],"Finally,":[475],"Parts":[476],"IV":[477],"V":[479],"consider":[480],"reject":[482],"variety":[484],"potential":[486],"challenges":[487],"separation-of-powers":[490],"model":[491],"proposal":[493],"sets":[496],"forth.":[497]},"counts_by_year":[{"year":2026,"cited_by_count":1},{"year":2023,"cited_by_count":1},{"year":2021,"cited_by_count":1},{"year":2017,"cited_by_count":2},{"year":2015,"cited_by_count":1},{"year":2014,"cited_by_count":1},{"year":2013,"cited_by_count":1},{"year":2012,"cited_by_count":3}],"updated_date":"2026-11-04T10:54:05.112534","created_date":"2018-05-17T00:00:00"}